'Is this research paper up-to-date?' New logo will tell you
Interactive CrossMark logo directs researchers to current versions
By Egbert van Wezenbeek, PhD Posted on 15 November 2012
One of the challenges researchers face is knowing whether they are consulting the most up-to-date version of an article or research.
At Elsevier, the editors of our journals work closely with authors and reviewers to ensure that articles have been thoroughly checked prior to publication. However, despite the most careful scrutiny, corrections, updates and errata, as well as retractions and withdrawals, are sometimes necessary. The challenge is that many versions of the article may still exist out on the web.
To combat this problem, Elsevier and other STM publishers have banded together with CrossRef to create the CrossMark identification service. By clicking on the CrossMark logos in online PDF or HTML documents, readers can quickly learn the current status of a document. If the one they have opened is not the most up-to-date, the logo will help them navigate to the most recent version available.
How does it work?
Publishers will display the new logo on journal content that has been assigned a CrossRef DOI. It will only appear on final published versions, not on Articles in Press.
Readers simply need to click on the logo and, if they are connected to the internet, a pop-up box will appear showing the current status of the document. This will work whether the reader is on the publisher's website, a third-party site or is viewing a PDF downloaded at an earlier date.
The most common pop-up will be the message that the document is still current. Occasionally, however, readers will discover that the document has updates, and a CrossRef DOI will link to the update on the Publisher’s site.
At Elsevier, we are aiming to roll this service out to all our journals. We began piloting it with 40 journals at the end of September and plan to roll it out to 1,250 of our 2,000 journals by the end of the year. Some journals have unique requirements, and publishers will be reaching out to those journals’ editors to discuss these in the coming weeks and months.
CrossMark offers a significant benefit to researchers. Not only does it create a standard across scholarly publishing for recognizing changes, it can also highlight important publication record information, such as publication history, the location of supplementary data, access policies, funding sources and peer-review processes.
Find out more about the Elsevier policy on CrossMark.[divider]
As Director of Publication Process Development, Dr. Egbert van Wezenbeek has been responsible for leading the CrossMark project at Elsevier. Overall, he is responsible for the design, development and implementation of improvements to the publication process of Elsevier's journal articles. The aim is to improve the experience of authors, editors and reviewers in their interaction with Elsevier and its systems, and to adapt and innovate processes to add more value to published articles. Dr. Van Wezenbeek has been working with Elsevier for more than 20 years in various publishing roles. He has a PhD in theoretical chemistry from the Free University Amsterdam.
- New resource will help biomedical researchers navigate an expanding web of disciplines
By Michael J. Caplan, MD, PhD | Posted on 25 Jun 2014
The Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier’s Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences writes about what inspired the project
- ‘Data in Brief’ articles make reproducibility a reality
By Paige Shaklee, PhD | Posted on 05 Mar 2014
The open access journal Genomics Data helps researchers make the most of their data
- Reference Modules can change the way researchers – and publishers – work
By Michelle McMahon | Posted on 16 Sep 2013
Elsevier creates continually updated reference works, starting with earth sciences and chemistry
- Visual metrics on journal websites increase transparency
By Linda Willems | Posted on 01 Jul 2013
Metrics and graphics give insight into performance of Elsevier journals
- Upcoming webinar on understanding #altmetrics
By Hannah Foreman | Posted on 24 May 2013
Webinar on Tuesday, June 11, was developed in response to feedback from research community
- Journal metrics getting more meaningful and easier to understand
By Sarah Huggett | Posted on 28 Mar 2013
What’s new with SNIP and SJR – and how are they calculated?
Author: Jean-Casimir Morreau MA
Department: Fashion & Branding
Institution: AMFI – Amsterdam Fashion Institute
Presented: 2013 IFFTI ANNUAL CONFERENCE | April 2-6, 2013, Los Angeles, USA
Theme: The Business & Marketing of Icons
Sub Theme: Building a Brand/ Designing New Icons
Contact me and I’ll send you the PDF
Why do logos look similar across the fashion industry? What are the defining characteristics of these logos that make them look and feel authentic & fashionable? This paper examines the recurring elements of iconic fashion logos, revealing the components that form an archetypical fashion brand logo. Inevitably proving that such characteristics are used frequently and can act as the design basis for new fashion logos. A large repository of 130 iconic, industry-leading, fashion logos were collected and analysed based on numerous recurring characteristics, resulting in the discovery of multiple visual elements distinctive for iconic fashion logos. Five of the most common visual elements include; Founder name, Monogram, Foundinglocation, Uppercasetypography and the Colorblack.
Based on thorough research, this study proposes five ‘design patterns‘ which designers and brand managers can choose to adhere to or reject when designing ‘new’ fashion logos.
Keywords: logo, visual identity, fashion logo, graphic design, branding.