Personal Narrative: Speech Self Critique
- Length: 355 words (1 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
Personal Narrative: Speech Self Critique
During my demonstration speech, I was affected by my speech anxiety. Some of the viewable symptoms were the shaking of my hands and also the stuttering of speech. I was able to control myself and relax after I started getting into my information. I did use some of the suggested relaxation techniques to relieve my anxiety. Before I got up to speak I thought confident of myself to help give me courage and confidence.
While watching my video I did notice that I was able to understand and clearly know what the main point was. I spoke in a clear and a tone loud enough for everyone to hear. The speech was organized very well, so one idea or thought flowed to the next. I don’t think I need to change anything in regards to my central idea being clear. I was satisfied with that part of the speech.
I happened to notice that I did use verbal pauses during transitions. When I would go from one topic to the next I would use the word “um.” This was very apparent when I was viewing the video of myself. I would like to be able to complete a speech without having to use any verbal pauses. I typically would use these pauses after I got done completing with a particular topic. I would say that this is one of my major problems with giving a speech. Now that I can see exactly how much I use them, I can change that in the future.
I did use some hand gestures in my speech. For the first few minutes I did not use them, but as I moved through my material and got into the actual demonstration some hand gestures were used. I also noticed in the video that I was not always watching the audience. I use to think that I made good eye contact, but after watching the film I really only glanced at the audience. I believe that I could make significant improvement in this part of my speeches. While I was up in front of the class I thought that I was looking out at the audience more then what I actually did.
I was very satisfied with the volume of my speech.
How to Cite this Page
| Exploring the Self: A Study of Hazlitt’s My First Acquaintance with Poets - “My First Acquaintance with Poets” was first published in 1823 in a short-lived but a highly significant periodical of the Romantic Age, The Liberal. If we go by the generic distinction this document is primarily an essay based on the reminiscences of the author of the experience he had almost twenty five years back when he met a “poet” for the first time in life, a moment of “baptism”, as he says, in the world of poetry and philosophy (Hazlitt, First Acquaintance). The essay can be taken as a memoir because it moves round a particular incident in the author’s life, i.e., his meeting with Coleridge, the successive interactions they had had in course of getting acquainted with each o... [tags: Literary Analysis]|
:: 7 Works Cited
| Narrative Critique of a Qualitative Research Study Essay - The study outlined in the article is well organized in its major parts, including introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and discussions. The introduction provides the research question and purpose, while the remaining parts provide sufficient data to help in justifying the hypothesis and rationale of the study. The introduction of the article explains all the important aspects of the study; the study is about using the bona fide group aspect to examine leadership. The introduction also explicitly indicates the aim of the study, which is to investigate the leadership process and success from a bona fide group’s perspective (Galanes, 2003, p.... [tags: introduction, review, results, discussions]|
:: 1 Works Cited
| A Critique on a Critique of a Speech: Lessons in Leadership from FDR - Everybody Will ALWAYS Judge You A Critique on a Critique of a Speech Many people throughout history have read and reread and discussed, critiqued, dissected, and reinterpreted other people’s stories and speeches. They all try to find a new way to look at them and try to make everybody listen to their ideas of what they mean. They pick out every tiny little detail of the said speech until there’s not much more to admire and sometimes they often miss the entire meaning of the written work. It is found to be rather tedious and obnoxious to take somebody else’s work and turn it into something else completely.... [tags: inaugural, action, evidence]|
:: 1 Works Cited
| Critique of Research Design Essay - Critique of Research Design The purpose of this critique is to analyze the design of a research study conducted by; Donna Kazemi, Maureen Levine, Jacek Dmochowski, Mary Nies, and Linman Sun called “Effects of Motivational Interviewing Intervention on Blackouts Amoung College Freshman”. It was accepted in January 21st, 2013 and was published in the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. This study was conducted on 188 volunteer freshmen at a southern university. Kazemi et al. (2013) state the goals of the study were to see if motivational interviewing (MI) worked as an effective intervention to reduce blackouts among freshman, who partook in high-risk drinking or drug use, during a sixth month per... [tags: critique of research design]|
:: 1 Works Cited
| A critique of Battle Royal by Ralph Ellison Essay - For the purpose of research and measurement of the scholars interpretive analysis skills, the scholar has chosen to critique work by Ralph Ellison entitled “Battle Royal”. In this paper, one will find what it means to be invisible. I argue from two different perspectives regarding who is invisible in the novel, and to whom those revealed persons are invisible to. Revealed will also be themes discovered throughout the story along with the authors use of irony that’s revealed in the work. In this work one will find supporting text from scholars who have taken issue with stereotyping, race relations in society along with one’s who have also critiqued Ellison’s work.... [tags: invisible man, self-discovery, readers]|
:: 4 Works Cited
| Critique of Thank You for Smoking? Essay - Critique of “Thank You for Smoking…?” “Thank You for Smoking…?” is an article written by Peter Brimelow about the benefits of smoking. Brimelow provides some very clear points which are well addressed. Even though I do not agree with the subject that “smoking, in a way, is good for you,” (141) I think Peter Brimelow did a thorough job of making his opinions credible to the reader. Major Claim and Grounds This essay is a good example of a deductive essay because it moves from generalizations to specific instances (McFadden, 2003).... [tags: Critiques]|
:: 2 Works Cited
|A Critique of the Juliette Beck Speech - A Critique of the Juliette Beck Speech Juliette Beck's speech, "Reclaiming Just and Sustainable Communities in the Age of Corporate Globalization" neither adequately described the problems of globalization as it is currently structured, nor did it provide any answers to the problems with it, either the real problems that actually exist (labor and environmental exploitation) or the problems that Beck purported (large corporations). Primarily, Beck's speech was flawed in that it was incoherent and empirical incorrect.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Political Essays]||964 words|
|Candide: A Critique Essay - Let me start off by saying that I thoroughly enjoy satires; it is the genre I appreciate most for its employment of wit and militant irony. Upon delving into Candide by Voltaire I was lured in by its display of ridiculously brutal situations that dramatized the many evils of human experience. I think Voltaire wonderfully crafted this particular satire through his conglomeration of themes and symbolisms. Seemingly swiftly Voltaire takes the reader through a manifold of episodes of extreme cruelty that prove both horrible and vividly comic.... [tags: Candide Voltaire Review Critique]||899 words|
|Nietzsche's Critique of Religion Essay - Nietzsche's critique of religion is largely based on his critique of Christianity. Nietzsche says that in modern Europe, people are atheistic, even though they don't realise it. People who say they are religious aren't really and those who say they have moved on haven't actually moved on. Certain people in society retain features of Christianity. For example, socialists still believe in equality in all people. Others still have pity for the poor and needy etc. Nietzsche dislikes religion especially Christianity because it encourages and promotes slave morality.... [tags: Nietzsche's Critique of Christianity]||1196 words|
|Critique of Graduation Speech by Billy Joel - Critique of Graduation Speech by Billy Joel Billy Joel is a very well known musician that is respected and acknowledged all around the world. I think he was an appropriate speaker for a college graduation. He used one question at the beginning of the speech that would catch the audiences curiosity; "Why do musicians give so much time to charitable causes?" and branched out from there to important issues. I think this showed a sense of organization and importance to the issue of why he was there.... [tags: Papers]||374 words|
Personal Narrative Speech Critique Demonstration Transitions Contact Topic Confidence Always Minutes
I spoke clear and everyone in the class could clearly understand what I was saying. I did trip up on a few words, but overall it was very clear and pronounced.
Going into the speech I wanted to leave a very good conclusion. I was very satisfied with my ending; I think I had everyone thinking about juggling after I was done. I could even bet someone went back home and tried to juggle.
It did seem different to see myself performing a speech. I have never had this opportunity before. This gave me a good view of myself from the audiences’ point of view. Now I am able to see how I actually perform and how I can improve for future speeches. This has given me a new look at how my speeches are performed and what I need to improve them for future speeches.
Jane Goodall Speaking Critique
- Length: 1326 words (3.8 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
On February 2, 2002, Dr. Jane Goodall appeared at Clemson University to speak to the students and public. I will attempt to evaluate her performance as a public speaker. Specifically, I will begin by describing the setting and audience for the event. I will then identify the ways in which Dr. Goodall would be described as an effective public speaker in the context of the textbook, Excellence in Public Speaking. I will then analyze the aspects of her performance that the textbook might have considered lacking. Finally, I will devote a few words to my personal opinion of the effectiveness of Dr. Goodall’s presentation.
Naturally, a speaker of Dr. Goodall’s prominence was expected to draw quite a crowd. She was speaking at the Brooks center, which, although large, was not expected to have the necessary capacity for all the people who wanted to attend the event. Clemson students got first chance at the tickets, and when the box office opened at 6:30, the line already extended half a mile down the sidewalk. I was fortunate/foresighted enough to pay a Clemson freshman to start standing in line for me at 4:00, so my seat was perfectly centered in the auditorium, seven rows from the front.
The hour-long presentation was ultimately concerned with rallying support for the Jane Goodall Institute and its “Roots and Shoots” program. Not surprisingly, the audience was comprised almost exclusively of admirers of Dr. Goodall’s work. Due to the shortage of seating in the Brooks center, the live audience consisted primarily of Clemson students and professors. Apparently there was overflow seating in other buildings; the people who couldn’t fit in the Brooks center were provided with a closed-circuit television broadcast of the presentation.
Dr. Goodall’s “attention-getter” was easily the most unique I’ve seen. She walked onto the stage, silently organized her notes, then held her head back and began hooting like a chimpanzee (having worked with chimps for some forty years, she does an uncannily accurate impression). She then smiled beatifically and announced, “that’s chimpanzee for ‘Hello’.” Not a soul in the audience doubted her word.
Essentially, in one action, she got the audience’s attention, introduced herself, and established credibility (though given her reputation, credibility did not really need to be established). Dr. Goodall quickly segued into a personal story about how she couldn’t have achieved anything without the unwavering support of her mother, establishing an emotional rapport with the audience – almost saying “It’s okay, I’m not better than you, you could just as easily be as remarkable a person as you seem to think I am.
How to Cite this Page
|The Incredible Work of Jane Goodall Essay - Jane Goodall is a historical woman that has taught human beings not only about chimpanzees, but human nature as well. This primatologist held on to a dream from childhood that advanced into reality. Jane quietly and patiently observed chimps in Africa, and then recorded their every move. Many important discoveries came about because of this. Jane Goodall has remarkably changed the perception of chimpanzees and humans alike. Despite the fact that Jane Goodall’s family was always on the move, her childhood was exciting.... [tags: Biology]||1506 words|
| Scientific Discoveries of Jane Goodall Essay - Jane Goodall was born on April 3, 1934, in London, England. Goodall, a British primatologist and anthropologist, is considered to be one of the world’s expert on chimpanzees. Goodall helped expand our knowledge on chimpanzees and a scientific way in researching. In Goodall’s early childhood, she received a life-like toy chimpanzee from her father in which she carried everywhere. Goodall loved to observe birds and animals, making notes and kept a wildlife journal detailing her observations. On July 1960, she decided to go to Africa and begin studying the Kasakela chimpanzee community in Gombe Stream National Park.... [tags: chimpanzees, interactionism, charles cooley]|
:: 8 Works Cited
| Jane Goodall: "The Monkey Lady" Essay - “Change happens by listening then starting a dialogue with the people who are doing something you don't believe is right.” Jane Goodall is one of the few people to take a closer look at the intricate nature of chimpanzees. She was born in London, England in 1934. Her first interaction with chimpanzees started at an early age when she received a doll from her parents. She received many worried complaints from her friends' parents telling her that chimpanzees were dangerous and unpredictable. Jane fell in love with the creatures.... [tags: Intricate Nature of Chimpanzees, Monkeys]|
:: 1 Works Cited
|A Brief Look at Jane van Lewick-Goodall Essay - EARLY YEARS In the summer of 1960, a young English woman arrived on the shores of Lake Tanganyika in Tanzania, East Africa. Although it was unheard of for a woman to venture into the wilds of the African forest at that time, going to Africa had bee n Jane Goodall’s childhood dream. As she first surveyed the mountains and valley forests of the Gomb e Stream Chimpanzee Reserve, she had no idea her coming efforts would redefine the relations hip between humans and animals, or that the project would continue into the 21 st century.... [tags: British primatologist, ethologist]||729 words|
| Jane Goodall: The Primatologist of Our Time Essay - April 3, 1934 a leader was born. A leader by the name of Jane Goodall, an extremely well rounded, primatologist of our time. Although this may seemed distant to many, it was actually her calling. At the age of one, Goodall received a stuffed chimpanzee that her father Herbert Goodall gave to her. She named the chimpanzee Jubilee, which she still keeps with her in her home in England. That was the beginning of her curious mind. She opened many eyes on the situation with chimpanzees being harmed in the jungles and discovered that they are just like “us” humans.... [tags: Animal Research ]|
:: 3 Works Cited
|Jane Goodall Essay - Jane Goodall Jane Goodall is one of the world’s most admired women, acclaimed scientist, and conservationist (www.nationalgeographic.com). The work that she does is called ethology, which is the study of animal behavior. Such a successful woman has numerous admirable qualities. She has contributed greatly to society as well as to the animal kingdom. Her research paved the way for countless primate studies, and has changed the way many people view chimpanzees. Trying to narrow down only three admirable qualities about her is difficult, since she has so many.... [tags: essays papers]||771 words|
|Jane Goodall Essay - Goodall, Jane. Through a Window. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1990. Jane Goodall’s books, Through a Window, In the Shadow of Man, and The Chimpanzees of Gombe, recount her many years as an observer of chimpanzees and other species of monkeys. In Through a Window, she gives her account of thirty years with chimpanzees in the village of Gombe, off of Lake Tanganyika. During those thirty years with her son and husband, she observed and researched the chimpanzees with the help of other researchers.... [tags: essays research papers]||678 words|
|jane goodall Essay - Jane Goodall was born in London, England in 1934. This British ethnologist who is still alive today has laid claim to many great accomplishments, traveled far distances and experienced many things no woman ever has. As a young girl Jane spent her days in England studying local birds and other creatures, reading books on zoology and dreaming of one day travelling to Africa. Jane's childish fancies were turned into reality when a close friend invited her to Kenya in 1957. Only a few months after her arrival 23 year old Jane met Dr.... [tags: essays research papers]||642 words|
|Jane Goodall Among the Wild Chimpanzees Essay example - Jane Goodall Among the Wild Chimpanzees Jane Goodall is a woman who has and still does work with chimpanzees in Tanznia, South Africa. The first time she went to Tanzania was in July 14, 1960 when she was just 26 years old. Because of her research and studies of many different chimpanzees, we as humans will be able to understand ourselves and other primates better. At first, Jane just sat on a peak at the top of a mountain, so that she could observe the chimps. The chimpanzees would keep a safe distance away so they were able to watch Jane and make sure that she wasn’t going to hurt them in any way.... [tags: Papers]||395 words|
|Essay on Harvest For Hope: A Guide To Mindful Eating Book Analysis - Harvest for Hope: A Guide to Mindful Eating By Jane Goodall Jane Goodall, a renowned scientist of primatology, ethology, and anthropology, began her studies when she ventured to Africa to work for Dr. Louis Leakey in 1957. From there Goodall earned her PhD at Cambridge University in 1965. She continued her studies, focusing especially on the study of chimpanzees; hence Goodall's nickname "the chimpanzee lady." In 1977, she established the Jane Goodall Institute to educate young people about conserving chimpanzees and all the other animals of this planet.... [tags: Jane Goodall]||992 words|
Jane Goodall Circuit Television Personal Opinion Critique Speaker Chimpanzee Seat Brooks Broadcast
” This was to become an important part of her message later in the speech.
The next twenty minutes or so were exactly what the audience had hoped to hear: stories of Dr. Jane Goodall and her chimpanzees. Each of her stories invariably related to the importance of respecting nature, but also served an important rhetorical purpose. By telling these stories, Dr. Goodall not only maintained the audience’s interest; but she also built support for the “sales pitch” at the end of the speech. Everything she said up to this point could be considered “getting the audience’s attention” in the context of a persuasive speech.
Perhaps then it was no surprise when, toward the end of the speech, Dr. Goodall spoke of the damage humans have done to the environment. As the textbook would phrase it, she “highlighted the need” for environmental reform. She then explained how the Jane Goodall Institute was committed to repairing our damaged environment, “proposing a satisfying solution.” She told inspirational stories (including many props: a whooping crane feather, a child’s toy monkey, and so forth) about people and animals that had found hope, either in her work or through the Institute’s. This was a particularly effective way to help the audience “visualize the solution”; the personal examples gave her emotional appeals a patina of intellectual support. Finally, she prompted the audience to action: “Join the Jane Goodall Institute! Participate in the Roots and Shoots program! If nothing else, buy this candy bar with the cute chimp picture on the wrapper!” Again, the textbook would have commended her technique. In fact, Dr. Goodall improved upon the textbook approach by setting such a fine example in her personal life: her ethos was perhaps the most powerful persuasive tool she had available. Her “call to action” consisted of a powerful message to stay hopeful, combined with the unspoken plea to try and do as much for the world as she herself had done. Because she had initially established an emotional rapport with the audience, this message was particularly effective.
Finally, to wrap up the speech, Dr. Goodall again tilted her head back and whooped a different chimp song – this one she translated as “Good Night”. This tied perfectly back into the attention getter at the beginning of the speech, and left a pleasing sense of completeness to her message. The audience responded with an enthusiastic standing ovation.
In spite of her talent as a public speaker, the textbook would have criticized Dr. Goodall’s presentation on a few points.
First, the speech lacked an internal preview. Dr. Goodall’s speech was extremely free flowing – it was practically conversational in tone. The audience was expecting her to talk about certain subjects, certainly, but Dr. Goodall never outright stated what subjects those would be. Likewise, the speech lacked a complete summary statement – while Dr. Goodall recapitulated her hope that the audience would join her institute, she didn’t summarize every major point of the speech.
On a few occasions, Dr. Goodall seemed to lose her train of thought. Once or twice she even went so far as to utter an “uh”; the majority of the time, however, she simply fell silent or filled in a word with which she was obviously unsatisfied. In the smooth-flowing context of her speech, these events were even more jarring than usual.
The final negative criticism I can offer is that Dr. Goodall occasionally broke from the ethos of humility that she had previously established with the stories about her mother. According to “Balance Theory,” this made it more difficult to agree with her message – the first hint of insincerity severely harmed her credibility. Perhaps it is one of the great ironies of ethos that the grander the reputation, the more easily damaged it can be. When describing how toxic the Earth’s environment had become, her tone frequently became didactic. Her exhortations to contribute to the Jane Goodall Institute reminded me of the “Save the Children” commercials, with an orphaned chimp in place of the little girl with flies in her eyes.
In spite of these criticisms, I was personally very impressed by Dr. Goodall’s presentation. She kept a large audience’s rapt attention for an hour or more. Her speech was both entertaining and inspirational. Even a grumpy old cynic like myself couldn’t help but be moved by the sincerity of her emotional appeals. While she did not follow the exact formal speech specification laid out in the textbook, she managed to present a coherent and thought-provoking lecture. Considering her age, compounded with the fact that she is away from home 300 nights per year promoting her cause, any shortcomings in her delivery could easily be forgiven – possibly even attributed to fatigue.
Jane Goodall’s message of hope for the future, combined with her Institute’s actions in support of this message, would be welcome regardless of the quality of her speaking presentation. Perhaps it is the power of this message that so compelled me personally. Everybody in the auditorium walked out with a silly grin – convinced that they could, indeed, take on the world and make it a better place. Certainly, Dr. Goodall is one of the most skilled public speakers I have had the privilege of seeing in person. With some luck, maybe her message will take root and actually effect some change. If nothing else, she has truly demonstrated the power of the well-spoken word.