Real-time U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only.
International stock quotes are delayed as per exchange requirements. Indexes may be real-time or delayed; refer to time stamps on index quote pages for information on delay times.
Quote data, except U.S. stocks, provided by SIX Financial Information.
Data is provided "as is" for informational purposes only and is not intended for trading purposes. SIX Financial Information (a) does not make any express or implied warranties of any kind regarding the data, including, without limitation, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use; and (b) shall not be liable for any errors, incompleteness, interruption or delay, action taken in reliance on any data, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Data may be intentionally delayed pursuant to supplier requirements.
All of the mutual fund and ETF information contained in this display was supplied by Lipper, A Thomson Reuters Company, subject to the following: Copyright © Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Bond quotes are updated in real-time. Source: Tullett Prebon.
Currency quotes are updated in real-time. Source: Tullet Prebon.
Fundamental company data and analyst estimates provided by FactSet. Copyright FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Holst, M., Ståhlbröst, A.: Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach. In: Proc. of HICSS 2009, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., Hribernik, K.A.: Living Labs as a Multi-Contextual R&D Methodology. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (2006)Google Scholar
Følstad, A.: Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. eJOV 10, 99–131 (2008)Google Scholar
Geelen, D.V., Keyson, D.V., Boess, S.U., Brezet, J.C.: Exploring the use of a game to stimulate energy saving in households. Journal of Design Research 10(1-2), 102–120 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hektner, J.M., Schmidt, J.A., Czikszentmihalyi, M.: Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage (2007)Google Scholar
Keyson, D.V., Al Mahmud, A., de Hoogh, M., Luxen, R.: Designing a Portable and Low Cost Home Energy Management Toolkit. In: Proc. ANT/SEIT, pp. 646–653 (2013)Google Scholar
Liedtke, C., von Geibler, J., Baedeker, C.: The sustainability living lab as a reflective user-integrating research infrastructure. In: 3rd International Conference on Sustainability Transitions, pp. 206–222 (2012)Google Scholar
Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., et al.: State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks. Milan, Italy (2006)Google Scholar
Ogonowski, C., Ley, B., et al.: Designing for the living room: long-term user involvement in a living lab. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1539–1548. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
Romero, N., Al Mahmud, A., Beella, S., Keyson, D.: Towards an Integrated Methodology to Design Sustainable Living Practices. In: Augusto, J.C., Wichert, R., Collier, R., Keyson, D., Salah, A.A., Tan, A.-H. (eds.) AmI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8309, pp. 299–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: White paper (eds.): User Experience White Paper. Outcome of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, Germany (2011)Google Scholar
Rutten, J.: Designing Ampul: exploring future prosumer interactions. Master thesis in Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology (2013)Google Scholar
Sleeswijk Visser, F., Visser, V.: Re-using users: cocreate and co-evaluate. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10(2-3), 148–152 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar